Friday, February 6, 2015

Products

Products I Use on A Daily Basis

Tracking where my products came from was a little easier than my food. This was because I feel that there is such a big movement against people using animals for experiments. People seem to be more open to changing the products they use than their diet so there is a lot of information out there. This is not to say that there is not a big movement against animals as food but people seem to shy away from that topic. Again I can say that this is an area that I do not really bat my eye on as I am more set on the products I use. If it tend to be a body care product or makeup, if I like it I will continue to buy it. This is where I can say that I am more selfish and it would be really hard for me to change the products I like using. Even after finding out where some of the products I used come from I still think that while I am open to finding alternative it might take longer for me to switch over to cruelty- free products.


Organix 

One of the very first things I do every morning like a lot of people is take a shower. I use Organix shampoo range as I saw it on Peta's website a while back and was interested in trying the product. Since then when I was doing my research for this project I found out that Peta had removed the product from its list of cruelty-free products. The company still advertises their products as cruelty-free so I was curious onto why PETA no longer considers them cruelty- free. It turns out that Organix is sold in China where it is mandatory for all products to be tested on animals. They claim that they do not test on animals unless it is required by law. It really had me thinking on why is it okay for this company to continue to market their brand as cruelty-free when they clearly engage in animal testing even if they claim it is not what they believe in? If you believe in something shouldn't you stick to it even if it might not be 100% beneficial to you?

In this case, Organix can stop selling their products in China. Yes, they would lose millions of dollars but they would still hold on to the so-called values they have of cruelty-free and organic. This made me reflect on the time someone told me that I could not consider myself a Christian and a Feminist. My first reaction was why not? Because I believe in God I should not think I should be entitled to the same rights as men. Shouldn't Organix be able to be a multi-million dollar business and also be cruelty-free. A lot of people suggest that if you want to be successful you have to do things you might not believe in. When was this double standard set up from business? I am still left wondering why they are allowed to advertise themselves as a cruelty- free brand in America but not in China. It is like saying in American I will say I am a Christian and a Feminist but if I go to another country I would not. Some might say that this is not a fair comparison but to be ones values and beliefs should not change just because another place might think differently.
Claims to be Not Tested On Animals

My second product that I use on a daily basis is Colgate, my toothpaste. I was pretty sure that this product was tested on animals. I find that most big, commercial products that I come across are. I was right, Colgate does test on animals. They claim to be committed to working towards the elimination of laboratory safety using animals. Colgate states that they only use animals testing when it is mandated by law and that 99% of their products is tested on non-animal alternatives. If Colgate claims that they are only using animal testing because the law makes them than is our government to "blame" for why we still use animals for testing purposes. If the government is the highest power and we the people technically have a say on how it should be run why are we not stopping animal testing and pushing for harder laws for alternatives?
Colgate
I think it is because we are not informed as consumers. For instance, what if sectioned of our products at the store as "TESTED ON ANIMALS" and "NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS". Would people be less inclined to buy those products that are not cruelty-free, forcing companies to find alternatives? I know for a fact that I would not consciously buy a product that was labeled as animal tested. I was also exposed to some pretty graphic images while searching from if Colgate does animal testing and I know for a fact is I got to see where my product came from and saw the disgusting images of rabbits with half their fur and skin hanging off their body I would never support that company.
I feel like if that government mandated that companies find other alternatives no matter the cost, we would be able to move from a society that uses animals for our use because they are a "cheaper source". At the end of the day I feel like it always comes back to money...this is where you could argue intersectionality comes into play as well. Government-Companies-Money seems to be the three factors that drive our society.

Meals...What I Ate Friday

Food I Ate

            I always start off my day with some type of cereal for breakfast. I never have really given much thought about where my cereal comes from or if it produced by companies that could potentially exploit animals or their employees. This is not to say I am ignorant that these things do happen. I just never really think it is ME who is buying into this exploitation.
Aldi Granola

I am not very loyal to one brand so when a friend gave me a bag of granola cereal she did not like I decided to try it. It is from a store called Aldi which from doing some research produces a lot of their own products. This really means they put their name on the packaging. There was not a lot of information I could find on this product. The packaging claims to be recycles and the product gluten-free. What I did notice is one of the ingredients on the back was cane sugar. While this is not directly related to animals, I did find that there is a lot of exploitation with cane harvesters and their profession leads to a lot of health problems like kidney disease. Most cane sugar harvesters are in someway infected with this disease and half of them do end up dying from it. Aldi also claims on their website that they are trying to be green by making everything they do on a smaller scale from recycled bags and cartons to not using plastics bags saving customers up to 50% on.
Salad to the bottom left is what I ate for lunch. Contained lettuce, strawberries, apples, avocado, cheese, eggs (which they claimed to be from a local chicken houses), cheese, and herbs.

For lunch I had a salad at a restaurant in D.C. which consisted of lettuce, strawberries, tomatoes, avocado, eggs and cheese to name the main ingredients. It did not contain any meat products but it did have dairy. After watching the video last class on the dairy farms I was a little more “self-aware” about the cheese on my meal. I did not know how cruel that industry was and it really saddened me. I did not know my meal came with cheese as I do not consume any type of dairy products as they make me sick. In a way I am a little relieved my body rejects dairy after seeing the suffering mother cows go through as they are being exploited for their milk. What really hit me was the way they are brutally separated from their calf’s immediately after birth. I did some research on cows and learned that they form bonds with other cows and are even known to have “friends”. I feel like I will never look at a milk jug or cheese on the shelf again after being introduced to this industry. It has made me reflect deeply on bonds I hold with my loved ones and how I would feel if they were taken from me for someone elses use. If they had absolutely no say in what the outcome of what their life was going to become. It really made me reflect about a reading we had in class where it spoke on inferiority and how we value animals less for having a “handicap”. In this case it would be the inability to speak. I thought about how as humans we think of people as less who might have difficulty speaking or
maybe even speak a different language than us and use it to our advantage and even exploit them.
"Dolphin Safe" Tuna
 For dinner I had a tuna salad, as I do not really eat meat but I do eat fish. The first thing I noticed was that the packaging said “Dolphin Safe” tuna. This means that they fish in a way that complies with policies and laws that are there to help minimize dolphin fatalities during fishing. According to the research I did, this policy originated in the United States. Depending on the country the laws and policies might be followed more strictly or loosely. I did have previous knowledge on the effects that fishing is causing the ocean. I know that we are fishing more than can be produced back into our oceans and that we are also destroying habitats which in return are essential to keeping our oceans alive. Without the ocean we would all die as our Earth depends on it. This is why 95% of the time I try to buy fish that is sustainably caught. I do know that this comes with great controversy as life the “Dolphin Safe” label many companies lie or manipulate what they consider sustainable. Digging in a little deeper, I found that there really is no guarantee that dolphins are not being harmed. Companies do face what the U.S. government calls “strict” charges but some activation groups say it is not enough. I cannot say I will completely cut fish out of my diet but I still think I will continue to try and be more conscious of where I am buying my food.

Reflecting on my food diary, I did not have a “bad” day of eating to my opinion. To a vegan or vegetarian I might still be considered a “bad” person or a hypocrite for deciding to eat fish but not meat. What I got from recording my food diary today is that I do need to ask question from where my food comes from. I might not even bat an eye to where my fish is coming from but the place my fish came from could have been the reason a thousand year old coral reef habitat could have been completely destroyed. Causing an entire species and those who depended on that coral to survive to know suffer. I even was able to put myself in the shoes of cows and realize that what really separated them and me is the power of “voice”. The ONE thing is keeping them from liberation, as some activists would say.

Animal Exploitation Footprint

Katerine’s Animal Exploitation Footprint


            The purpose of this assignment was for me to reflect on the ways in which animals are exploited and how I contribute to their exploitation. The last couple of weeks in class, my eyes have been opened to the “power” we hold as humans and the effects our choices have. These choices might not seem like they have consequences that impact our day significantly but somewhere in the world they did contribute to having an impact. I decided to take photographs of items I use day to day and reflect on where they came from, what I am putting in my body, and the greater impact this "one" item I am consuming has on others. Especially when it comes to reflecting on what is a need and what is a want, I can definitely see how many of the products I use are a selfish want and I should be looking for alternatives. From the moment I buy a product that is exploiting an animal I am giving permission for the company to continue to do what they do. It just does not affect animals but could be supporting poor working conditions, exploitation of children, to name a few things my money is continuing to facilitate. When you really start to see the impact you have at a bigger scale it makes you really question all aspects of your life.



"Animals do not exist for human entertainment, sport, utility, and we ought not to deprive them of their vital needs to satisfy our trivial needs" -Jennifer Hickman